My main
responsibility for this project was to
undertake the lighting model. Having never used MEP software before, it proved
to be an interesting learning experience and wasn’t without it’s issues,
I was in charge of all
the lighting design and implementation within the project. This included
lighting layout design, researching real world products and finding their BIM
families, and detailing the wiring layout with the rooms.
As a secondary role, I
looked after the models master file and reviewed it weekly to ensure that
everyone’s files were linked correctly and no major clashes were present. There
were a few cases were either some walls were missing or structure was clashing
with interior walls etc so it was easier for me to make these corrections on a
weekly basis instead of waiting till the end to correct everything and risk
missing a few details.
As part of the
presentation process, I also set-up the renders and visualisations for the
project. These renders, which we will show in more detail later, really
showcase our work and help portray our response to the brief a lot better than
just plans and sections.
With our project, we
found that, although it would have been perfect to all simultaneously works on
our respective areas, it was just not realistic considering that some models
relied on the completion of other models so they could start.
For the lighting
model, it relied primarily on the architecture models as I needed all the rooms
modelled and allocated before I could start figuring out what lighting is
needed. My aim was to provided sufficient lighting for all workspaces and
living quarters, several feature lighting installations in the main public
areas, and specialised gallery down lighting. The gallery part involved working
closely with the interior modeller (Jake) so that all the specific artwork
illumination worked with the exhibition walls.
The company I decided
to use was Cooper industries as I liked their style and thought it would work
well with our design, and all of their products had a Revit family available
for downloaded with included all relevant specs. Using these instead of just
the generic families within Revit allows the model to start to fully utilise
its BIM capabilities.
We
had a fair share of issues with the project. Nothing heartbreaking but still an
inconvenience nevertheless.
The first thing that
affected me was missing ceilings in the architectural model. A minor oversight
in the initial architectural meant that there weren't any ceilings for me to
start placing lights on. This caused a set-back in our time frame of work as I
had to go back into the Architect model and draw in all the ceilings for the
building.
Ceilings continued to
be an annoyance for me as once I finished drawing them, the ceilings in the
linked model weren't being picked up in the MEP software suite. I had to resort
to placing them on the ceilings underside face in 3d views, using a combination
of section boxes and isolation tools. This slowed down by process quite a lot
as each new style of light had to be re-placed in 3d then moved in plan.
As far as group issues
go, one thing that caught us up was inconsistent file locations/versions. At
some stages someone would take a copy of a file home to work on, and not load
the revised edition back up so others would be working with an old/different
file. We decided that to maintain consistency, we would only use USB and
DropBox for backup purposes and everything else would remain on the
StudentShare drive.



No comments:
Post a Comment